a real winner
Aug. 29th, 2008 10:43 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?
SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance."
- from a questionnaire Sarah Palin answered while running for governor.
the pledge was written in 1892. unless the zombie founding fathers wrote it, and then rose again in the 1950s to campaign for the addition of "under God" because they forgot it the first time, they had nothing to do with it.
she also believes in abstinence education instead of actual sex ed classes, and she supports teaching of intelligent design. what an intellectual powerhouse.
SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance."
- from a questionnaire Sarah Palin answered while running for governor.
the pledge was written in 1892. unless the zombie founding fathers wrote it, and then rose again in the 1950s to campaign for the addition of "under God" because they forgot it the first time, they had nothing to do with it.
she also believes in abstinence education instead of actual sex ed classes, and she supports teaching of intelligent design. what an intellectual powerhouse.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 06:43 pm (UTC)it's not clear to me why everything the FFs did is necessarily above criticism either. but then i'm an ignurint furrinner, so what do i know.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 07:10 pm (UTC)The Democratic Party: Everything that didn't get the vote in 1776.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 06:45 pm (UTC)Is she the best conservative woman politician with experience the Republicans can come up with? Is she as good as it gets, or did they pass over other, more experienced women, and why?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:21 pm (UTC)now this is probably too crazy to be true, but my is it delicious.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:38 pm (UTC)I mean, it's not like you could actually keep a secret like that.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 01:10 am (UTC)And if there's one state in the country where you might be able to pull it off...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 01:15 pm (UTC)Although she seems like ridiculous choice from a general-election viewpoint, she's a really solid choice from a fund-raising standpoint. McCain's campaign has been in money trouble because the extreme right just doesn't trust him. With her around to smile, flash her pretty smile, and enthusiastically spout "intelligent design", the merits of hunting from helicopters, and the need to drill for oil in national parks, she's just what McCain needs to open up right-wing extremists' checkbooks.
The problem is, once she has to talk to the general public, she'll be trouble. Unless they can hide her from the general public through the entire campaign, she's likely to lose more votes through her views than she gains through her boost to McCain's fund-raising power.
On the other hand, if McCain had selected a moderate – someone like Olympia Snowe – McCain's already-shaky credibility with the extreme right would continue to evaporate. They'd likely write him off as a lost cause, and try to rescue Republicans in Congress who will be endangered by Obama's coat-tails, or just save their money for 2012.