i had been laboring over a review of Counting Heads - i was frustrated that what i saw as a brilliant failure got such good press*.
the opening:
dear Tor,
thanks for crediting your editors. i will try to remember to use this feature in the future when choosing books to read.
Counting Heads is a brilliant failure, and i now know that i should blame David G. Hartwell. this book contains the seeds of five to ten great novels, but none of them were nurtured into existence. instead, we have a recycled container full of a slop of ideas.
but a guy on Amazon pretty much wrote the rest for me. (he even encourages people to read Neal Stephenson and
matt_ruff instead.)
*then again, the loudest praise came from Cory Doctorow, who has similar limitations as an author, and that NYT tool.
the opening:
dear Tor,
thanks for crediting your editors. i will try to remember to use this feature in the future when choosing books to read.
Counting Heads is a brilliant failure, and i now know that i should blame David G. Hartwell. this book contains the seeds of five to ten great novels, but none of them were nurtured into existence. instead, we have a recycled container full of a slop of ideas.
but a guy on Amazon pretty much wrote the rest for me. (he even encourages people to read Neal Stephenson and
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
*then again, the loudest praise came from Cory Doctorow, who has similar limitations as an author, and that NYT tool.