anyhoo, one of them is Designs for Knitting Kilt Hose and Knickerbocker Stockings. It is so charmingly half-assed. Originally it was self-published in Scotland in 1978, and the author was about 78 at the time. It assumes that the reader is intimately familiar with kilt hose, and the concept of cuffs hiding a garter, and calf decreases.
she doesn't bother with a legend for her stitch abbreviations** until there's a section she lifted from antique pattern books. THEN there's a legend and the untranslated patterns for a couple pages.
the best part? The section on argyle where she admits that she was never able to finish an argyle sock!
I will be able to make good use of it, but a few years ago it would have been impossible for me to decipher.
*they made some poor choices when they relocated a few years ago, and they exhausted all their resources. the storefront closes this month.
**w.o. stands for wool over, which folks in the US call a yarnover.
there was a point last week (I think it was when I chained the slaver to the human sacrifice tree with the manacles he had used to chain slaves, and left him there) where C said "ironymaiden is back!"
I like to say that I know the love of a taciturn man, but what if we're really Dianda and Patrick Lorden*?
*there are no good links. She's a murder mermaid, he's her conscience. I may have to build out their stub on the fandom wiki.
There was some research done on dog names that suggested that they best understand two syllables with a vowel sound at the end. So we start there. Then no duplication with friends, family, or their pets. Must be spelled such that a vet office or stranger reading the collar tag can pronounce it.
after that, it's what is pleasant to say and/or meaningful to us. I've written a longer bit about naming our current dog previously, I'll try to link it. Leela (Sevateem, not Turanga) is just right.
2. Poirot or Miss Marpel?
3. Do you have a FB account too?
yeah. Facebook is a wretched hive of scum and villainy. I don’t browse it anymore. My friends have instructions to earburn me if they want me to see a thing.
4. Books - hardcover or paperback
books! Paperback or ebook; hardcovers are inappropriate for my lifestyle. I like hardcover for reference and game books.
5. Mobile(cell phone): Windows/Android or Apple?
The question is poorly formatted, Windows Phone and Android are separate operating systems. /pedant
Android. I had an iPhone but then they got too big to fit in my pocket.
Questions from thefridayfive
as mentioned previously, the science GOH is a costumer with a magnificent beard, and i will always treasure in my heart the memory of him using his trident to point out features on projections of Pluto and Charon.
i didn't do much with the other guests...not very interesting to me, or already in my social circle. i did enjoy the Angry Robot books panels. their founder is a character, but in a good way*. the household ended up with three of their books as swag, they all sound good.
loose panel notes:
- The key to pinup art is extra vertebrae. More length in torso shows off hip and breasts. (Most people are 5.5 heads tall.)
- Chris Wahl beefcake Popeye and Shaggy
- Lunar soil is too spiky for plant roots. It will literally cut through them. To farm on the moon we need to tumble the soil. Mars is easier since there has been water. Mars dirt is more like diatomaceous earth.
- (on radiation exposure) Lung tissue collects alpha particles
- Neutron radiation is only an issue in places like Hanford where the concentration is crazy high
- glacial lake Missoula flood
- Harold McCluskey accident
- Radioactive kitty litter
- Helium comes from decaying radioactive material
- Nagasaki material came from 100b. Now open for tours.
- Tritium contamination treatment: half rack of beer on the way home
*ask me about my impressions of Jim Baen for contrast
(i feel like the Best Series Hugo was designed for the Vorkosigan Saga, so i don't expect October Daye to make it this year.)
led to suggestions of "Disaster Area" and "Hotblack Desiato".
which is how i figured out that it's been 25 years since "Mostly Harmless"
came out. (if you haven't read it, don't read it, it's crap.)
on the one hand, i appreciate that i remember details about The
Restaurant at the End of the Universe enough that i didn't have to
look anything up. on the other hand, i'm feeling old.
i read Flex and The Flux over the holidays. enjoyed the heck out of them.
i was thinking about why i liked them better than Ready Player One or His Majesty's Dragon, since they're falling apart in similar ways as soon as i examine them .
let me back up.
Ready Player One was enjoyable, but it annoyed me with its obsessive reliance on references,and using them in ways that didn't serve the story. (it annoyed me even more that the dead character was too young for the content he was obsessed with.) the references got intrusive and painful and masturbatory and overrode the otherwise interesting worldbuilding and story.
His Majesty's Dragon failed on its premise. somehow, intelligent dragons have always been around,and somehow, world history and culture is almost entirely unchanged. oh, and Napoleon is the first person to think of using dragons as dropships for ground troops. complete and utter bullshit. i kind of hate-read some of the sequels, not sure why at this remove, because the writing style annoyed me - i know that she considered Patrick O'Brian to be a major influence and *shudder* she is no Patrick O'Brian. i just kept hoping the world would get better, i guess. (i do HIGHLY RECOMMEND Novik's unrelated book Uprooted. i don't know how they come from the same person.)
in the 'Mancer books, magic is powered by obsession. so you get powers based on fire, or art, or paperwork, or video games. every time you warp the world with your obsession, you have to deal with a flux of bad luck. magic is illegal because it's stupidly dangerous. Europe is a no-man's land post WWII.
the books hinge on an AU where technology and popular culture are basically exactly the tech and culture we know today. one of the main characters is a video game 'mancer who uses familiar console tech and game characters and mechanics to manipulate the world.
if you think for five minutes about how a chunk of the industrialized world disappearing 70 years ago would change both the economy and art, the soufflé deflates. (and that doesn't even address MAGIC,or what happened in the Pacific...Japan must be fine because there's Nintendo and Mortal Kombat. but why? why? why?)
Steinmetz wears his influences on his sleeve. but he's very clever with them, and it so happens that i like his influences.* there was a moment where i literally pumped my fist in the air. (there was also a moment where i stopped and said, yes, Ferrett, i also liked that scene.) but the key here is that the characters are great, their motivations and actions are organic to those characters, and the cultural stuff is almost entirely crucial to the plot and integral to the action instead of "look what i did there".
will you love it if you have never played a video game? i think it's quite possible. and it's pretty hard to be a nerd without having been exposed in a general cultural way to the stuff used in the books. there's certainly enough friendship and adventure to make up for all the Mario. (and there's a fat female nerd with a sex life. *sparkly heart emoji*)
*well, okay, i really really wanted to like Breaking Bad but was blocked by the stuff with his inlaws and his wife. ironymaiden: loves making drugs, killing people,and becoming a horrible person. can't stand mundane family conflict.
- i'm in love with The Great British Bake Off. (that's "The Great British Baking Show" to PBS viewers. no links, wikipedia and pretty much everything else online is full of spoilers.) if you loved the Japanese Iron Chef for its combination of food porn and a window into another culture, and you also enjoy the human interest segments during the Olympics, then you just might love this show. (they even have little segments where they visit food historians! food. historians.) yes, it's reality tv where there are challenges and people get eliminated. but it's a clean competition - no inducing of conflict, no creation of rivalries or villains, no nasty judges. the people competing actually cheer for each other and help each other along.* they hug the people who get eliminated at the end of the episode. one of the judges totally teared up talking about the awesomeness of the 2015 winner. it is sweet and soothing comfort tv. the 2014 season is on Netflix and Amazon Prime.
also, i have a dog. she is energetic and exasperating and ridiculously cute and affectionate. dog.
*i don't recommend any of the regional clones that i've tried. there's something very specific about Brit culture plus these judgesand these hosts. GBBO is where it's at.
I read Uprooted, and it was great. I had picked up a promo at comiccon, and enjoyed it, but I was skeptical because Naomi Novik does not have a great track record as far as I'm concerned, kind of a dis-recommendation: "Remember those stupid faux-Aubreyad books with the cruddy world-building and the chatty dragons?" Please ignore. If you have loved Robin McKinley or that one Orson Scott Card fairytale book (Enchanted, worth getting from a Library) you should read this thing. frabjouslinz loved it, she was right. It's not just about a woman and her mentor, it's also about best friends and the way women compete (and no love triangle).
Make a plan and follow it through. With the tablet, I was able to chart out a knitting idea and then swatch the chart. It changed my thinking about the pattern. But I did it without having to knit the entire thing and rip it out, or take copious notes. I made the notes first. Way easier, and I learned lots about the notes app on my tablet.
I am drinking a Not Your Father's Root Beer. Om nom nom.
i just finished reading Bridge of Birds by Barry Hughart. it was such a delight. if you love both The Lies of Locke Lamora and Kung Fu Hustle, you will love this. (man, i want to see Stephen Chow adapt it for film. i don't think anyone else could do it justice.)
Mad Max: Fury Road is the gift that keeps on giving: Feminist Mad Max
it has me thinking about perception a great deal, especially since i think of myself as enjoying structure, but consider the idea of a series of novels built around color references to be pretentious bullshit.
22. Your "comfort" book
Discussed in question 13, rereads. The Blue Sword, moving on.
23. Favourite book cover including a picture!
This is tough. Part of me wishes that books not have representative cover art. Covers are a marketing tool, and often they misrepresent characters or even act as spoilers. (my
while i'm not crazy about the text treatment, the art captures the setting of the book and the nature of the protagonists. i love the angles and the contrast of the ice with the dark sky. you can read so much into the image before and after reading the book. are there tears on those faces? strong or weak? serene or trapped?
my current favorite book art direction has to be Boneshaker. really great marriage of text and image, and as kylecassidy says, it's so Steampunk the text is brown. (really. my copy is printed in dark brown ink. it's subtle, but a great effect that is still easy on the eyes.)
24. Favourite fictional relationship (romantic, friendship, familial)
oof. let's do all three.
romantic: i can't quite answer this one. so often in genre books romance is a thing we do not get into because it is covered in girl cooties. the truth is that everyone has a soft spot for a love interest as long as it doesn't feel pasted on and stays true to the characters. (most hated romantic relationship, Bean/Petra in the second set of Ender books. Card has a lot of issues anyway, but damn. making Petra rabid about bearing superbabies? really? i stopped reading right there.) i have a hard time separating the relationship itself from "these two people i like". and often my favorite couples will drop into the background as soon as they're happily together, because seemingly writing stories about people who are happily together is extra-hard. that issue is discussed very well here.
friendship: the easy answer is Jack Aubrey and Stephen Maturin. they grow and change together, live through good times and bad, have misunderstandings and annoyances, and make up when they argue. it's good, and (as much as fans might want it to be) it's not slashy. we just don't have very many good models of men being good friends to one another these days. the less easy answer is Mac and Brymn - introvert marine biologist and extrovert alien archeologist in a complex situation...i love their relationship and the contrast through the series of Mac's friendship with Brymn and with her human colleague Emily.
familial: the Vorkosigans. i don't know where to start or stop - there are multiple generations now, there are different parenting styles and generational thinking represented, there are great parents, awkward children, chips on shoulders, rakish cousins...it's as slopplily complex as a real family, complete with occasional blurring of lines between friends/family/business. i like them so much that i'll forgive Bujold for the bug butter.
i can't think of any.
why would i read a book i thought i wouldn't like, unless it was for school? i had less assigned fiction reading than many people my age due to being an advanced reader and AP testing out of required college English classes, but i was always pretty game for what i considered the easiest homework ever. i can list off books i thought i would like that i didn't like. i can also come up with books that i liked better when i gave them another chance. but thought i wouldn't like but ended up loving? nonexistent.
sentimental favorite picture book: Andy Ant by Pops Winky. it's unfortunately out of print (and goofily 70s in illustration style). it's the story of the very game but hapless Andy trying to find his place in society - he starts a job with good intentions, gets in over his head, and disaster strikes. eventually after much trial and error he finds the right fit and everyone is happy. thinking about it, it's kind of a crazy thing to have a comedy picture book about a
junior fiction: i was thinking about this, and it's difficult because i skipped past these books pretty quickly - once i started reading i went from zero to "sixth grade" in short order. and those books didn't get reread like YA books did. are Farmer Boy and Little House in the Big Woods junior fiction? if so, those. Farmer Boy is something my mother wanted to share with me so much that we read through it together even though i was able to read it by myself (and later IIRC we even tried to milk feed a pumpkin).
Young Adult: i don't even know where to start. part of my heart is always here - i think some of the best genre fiction being produced right now is on the YA shelf and i read quite a bit of it. if you're skipping them because they're "kids' books" you're missing out. i especially recommend Sabriel by Garth Nix and the Attolia books by Megan Whalen Turner. i've already talked about my relationship with Dragonsong and The Blue Sword elsewhere. maybe this is where i put Anne of Green Gables* or The Secret Garden?
*i read it sometime during elementary school (i remember it was before the miniseries hit and caused a wave of attention for the books) and i had the hardest time understanding that Canada was a different country. even with the different educational system, and the wacky order-an-orphan thing, and the bit where they talk about the American tourists. PEI might as well have been upstate New York. i think maybe that's where i imagined it was.
still not in favor of superlatives. i can count the clear favorite things in my life on one hand and have fingers left over. right now i'm coming up with the one i repeat often - C is my favorite person. um, Seattle is my favorite of the places i've lived. green is my favorite color. ...and now i'm scrabbling.
the tough thing about book series is that usually the first one is great and then the quality keeps dropping. often i will start out owning all of a trilogy or series and then as time goes on sell off the later books and keep only the first one because it's all that bears rereading.
the exception is a series that is really one giant continuous story. so i'll keep all of the Inda books (the third one has the most memorable scenes but i wouldn't call any one volume the best). i don't own all of the Aubrey/Maturin books yet, but i periodically do the "tell the publisher" Kindle request on amazon. because if i could have all of anything on my magic book, it would be those books. carrying twenty volumes of Aubrey/Maturin at once is what ereaders are made for. (what really pisses me off is that Norton does publish other ebooks. just not those. my hatred is pure.)
anyway, the closest thing i have to an answer to the question is Discworld. which is interesting in that there is a whole section of that series that i hate, won't own, and won't reread. Rincewind sucks. always and forever. (i note that people who try Discworld and fail usually tried with a Rincewind book. i can't blame them.) if you're familiar with Discworld, there are actually several series within the series. so i don't like the Rincewind books. and while i love the Witches, there's never been one that lived up to Wyrd Sisters. but the Guard books and the Death books are pretty consistently solid and Pratchett keeps doing interesting things with those characters. my favorite Guard book is The Fifth Elephant (dwarf culture, Sgt Angua, Gaspode, Lady Sybil kicks ass WITH OPERA). my favorite Death book is Hogfather (among other things, Pratchett writes the most accurate and evocative description of hogs i have ever read - dude has seen live pigs and evokes a powerful sense memory).
as i have grown older, mostly only when i'm asked to do so. but then i do so with gusto. and often as not, follow it by handing you the relevant book.
force everyone to read one book? see previous "as i have grown older"...i understand that what i like is not what you like. what gets me to think more deeply about a subject may have no effect on you. i can't even say that "likes book foo, dislikes book bar" is a rule of thumb for people i want to associate with. (seriously, mimerki doesn't like Jane Eyre. but she's still awesome. i assume that others like me in spite of my tepid response to Jane Austen.)
16. Adaptation: What book would you most like to see made into a film? Do you like to read the book first or see the film? Any books you have read after seeing the film version?
i remember being horribly disappointed when i saw the film version of The Black Stallion because it had changed so many things from the book, and my mom patiently trying to explain adaptation to mini-me. i think the first time i appreciated the adapted film and the book as related entities to be judged on their own merits was The Hunt for Red October. still my knee-jerk reaction is that i don't care to have a favorite "ruined" by someone else's imagination, and i hate how many people i have met who watch the Harry Potter films instead of reading the books. OTOH, i always like to see a favored book's audience expand.
i guess i would like to see Bad Monkeys or The Mirage made into a film because i want matt_ruff to get a dumptruck full of Hollywood money.
if something i haven't read is being made into a film that looks interesting, i don't rush to read it first. more often than not, that will lead to me quibbling with the adaptation. if i see the film and then read the book, i usually can enjoy both more although sometimes it stifles my imagination to have visual templates for characters and locations. i read The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen after i saw the film, and it made the film look even worse. i started reading Hellboy after the film, and it made me appreciate Del Toro's adaptation work (i liked the film to begin with, in spite of the mysteriously fireproof clothing). and rewatching is full of cookies for people who have read the comics.
17. What is the most difficult book you’ve ever read?
vague superlatives. stop that, anonymous question writer.
perhaps the answer is Tender Morsels by Margo Lanagan. it certainly has stuck with me since i read it, and i've meant to write about it several times, but it hasn't resolved into a shape that i could put into words.
i think part of what causes me trouble with the book is that it delivered a literary fiction experience that i would not have chosen for myself - i'm never going to pick up Push - because i don't find that sort of misery entertaining. it's not that i can't accept bad or emotionally complex things happening to characters - i'm often resistant to too-pat happy endings - but Tender Morsels left me feeling (please forgive me but i'm not coming up with a better turn of phrase) screwed over.
this is a story about a rape and abuse survivor who is unlike any of the survivors i know. i realize that every survivor is different, and i don't presume to judge. but my first huge difficulty with the book is that Our Heroine decides that she really really wants to have her abuser's baby. i can see how she's trying to produce a pure relationship, and that hiding the pregnancy in order to go to term is in itself an assertion of control...i just can't swallow it without choking. a lot of the book is like that for me.
yet i'm not willing to say that it is a "bad" book. that's difficult too. (and i'm perfectly willing to say that i think well-written and popular books like Wicked and Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell are bad.)